Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.
Is the information you find on the internet less reliable than the information in academic journals to which the UB subscribes?
Why is peer review a good indication of how reliable the information is?
Say, you have to write a paper about the Dutch peacekeeping mission in Uruzgan (Afghanistan) in the period 2006-2010. Your research question is: which factors played a part in the decision-making process in the Netherlands in 2005/2006 when the initial decision was made, in 2008 when the mission was prolonged, and in 2010 when the mission was terminated. You are searching for scholarly literature that you can use as a source for your paper.
Suppose you find the following publications:
- Jair van der Lijn, "Comprehensive Approaches, Diverse Coherences: The Different Levels of Policy Coherence in the Dutch 3D Approach in Afghanistan," Small Wars and Insurgencies 26, no.1 (Jan. 2015): 72-89
- "Afghanistan: Parliamentary Debate on Prolongation of Dutch Military Presence," SP International, December 17, 2007
- Mirjam Grandia, Deadly Embrace: the Decision Paths to Uruzgan and Helmand (Faculty of Social and Behavioural Sciences, Leiden University, 2015).
- George Dimitriu and Beatrice de Graaf, "The Dutch COIN Approach: Three Years in Uruzgan, 2006–2009," Small Wars & Insurgencies 21, no. 3 (2010): 429-458.
Use the criteria that you find in the chapter Evaluating to rank these papers in order of decreasing usefulness. Explain your choices.