Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Information Literacy Archaeology: Evaluation criteria: relevance and reliability


Information is relevant when it helps you to answer your research question. You assess the information on the basis of format, content and degree of up-to-dateness.

Content and level of the information

Does the information support your research question and the aim of your research?

Ask yourself the following questions:

* Does the information answer my research question?

* Is the level/standard of the information appropriate for my research question and the aim of my research?

When you are conducting academic research into depression, an article from Cosmopolitan or Hello! will not provide information of the standard you require. You need information which satisfies scientific requirements. Articles from academic journals are therefore more appropriate. (See the chapter Choosing information sources)

The form of the information

Have you chosen the right type of source (book, article, thesis, etc.) for the information you need?

If you are looking for background information, it may be better to look at a book or website rather than an in-depth research article. If you are writing a light-hearted article (e.g. for National Geographic), you won’t need to read PhD theses. For more information, see the chapter Choosing information sources.


The term ‘current’ usually refers to recent events or developments. The date of publication of an article is an indication of the currency of the information it contains. The general rule is: the more recent, the better. When there are several editions of a book, you should use the most recent one.

If your research is about the Dead Sea Scrolls, it's useless to look for articles published before 1947 because the Scrolls were only discovered between 1947 and 1956.

Also keep in mind that when you are studying a certain topic it could be that the approach towards the topic has changed over time. This may make certain older publications no longer current. On the other hand, an older publication may still adequately describe the essence of a certain development. In that case such a publication may still considered to be current.


How complete is the information you have found?
Are you sure you haven‘t overlooked any relevant information? Have you considered all points of view? Although being comprehensive is usually not possible and at this stage in your academic career not strictly necessary, you should always try to be as complete as possible in the literature you are using for your research.

Use the CRAAP test

Checklist for evaluation of information (sources)

A useful checklist to help you assess the quality of information (sources) is the so-called CRAAP test


This refers to how sure you can be that the information is correct. How credible is the information? How objective is the information? There are several aspects to take into consideration when you are assessing how reliable your information is. These aspects relate to the origin of the information as well as its quality.

Authority of the source (author/organization) and origin of the document

* What do you know about the author? Is he an authority on the subject? Is he a recognized author in his subject area? Which organization does he work for?

* What do you know about the organization? Publications by well-known and respected organizations are generally more reliable than material published by vague charitable foundations with dubious or unclear objectives.

* Does the author or organization receive funding from sponsors? Sponsorship is not necessarily a problem, but be aware of any commercial interests that may be involved.

* Is the quality of the publication assessed? If so, is this done by editors? Are articles peer reviewed?  Peer-reviewed articles are very reliable because they have been critically assessed by more than one expert/academic.



* Are the supposedly factual descriptions correct? Check whether they are backed up by information in other sources.
* Are opinions supported by facts?


* Is informing the reader the author's primary goal, or is he rather trying to persuade his audience? (Opinion-forming, propaganda, etc.)
* Is the information based on hard facts or on opinions?
* Is the subject explored from different perspectives?


* Are source references provided?
* What is the quality of the cited sources?
* Is it possible to verify whether the information is correct and complete?

Kate Turabian about assessing the usability of publications

In Kate Turabian's book A manual for writers of term papers, theses, and dissertations you will find information on assessing the usability of literature, on page 33-36. The criteria mentioned here are 'relevance' and 'reliability'. 'Relevance' relates to the subject of a publication. She shows how you can discover quickly what a publication is about. You can assess the 'reliability' of a publication by looking at the author, the publisher, whether it has been peer-reviewed or not, how the publication has been reviewed in book reviews and how often it has been cited by other scholars.

The reliability of material found on the internet is harder to assess, because this has been published outside of regular scientific publishing channels.