Is the information you find on the internet less reliable than the information in academic journals to which the UB subscribes?
Why is peer review a good indication of how reliable the information is?
Say, you have to write a paper on the Chaîne opératoire or the operational sequences of pottery production during the Neolithic (Chaîne opératoire is the “operational chain” or “operational sequence” and as a term used throughout anthropological discourse, but is commonly used in archaeology. It functions as a methodological tool for analysing the technical processes and social acts involved in the step-by-step production, use, and eventual disposal of artefacts, such as lithic tools or pottery).
You are searching for scholarly literature that you can use as a source for your paper.
Suppose you find the following publications:
Detecting and explaining technological innovation in prehistoric Europe
Use the criteria that you find in the chapter Evaluating to rank these papers in order of decreasing usefulness. Explain your choices.
Answer and explanation for query ‘Chaîne opératoire or the operational sequences of pottery production during the Neolithic’.