A systematic review attempts to collate all empirical evidence that fits pre-specified eligibility criteria in order to answer a specific research question. The key characteristics of a systematic review are:
The systematic review process has been developed to minimise bias and ensure transparency. Methods should be adequately documented so that they can be replicated. The systematic review is an approach used in health, education and social policy (as part of evidence based policy or practice) and is much more than a 'literature review' because it follows a strict methodology which means it is 'transparent, rigorous and replicable'.
When conducted well, systematic reviews should give us the best possible estimate of any true effect. An assessment of the methodological quality of reviews should highlight the limitations of a review.
Systematic reviews are gaining in popularity at medical research institutions across Europe and America. Guidelines either state the need for or highly recommend the involvement of a librarian or information professional when undergoing a systematic review project.
The Library is closed, but we are available to help!
UMCG-employees and (RUG) students are welcome to make an appointment about search strategy for a systematic review or a CAT.
When scheduling the appointment you can choose between help via email or via an online meeting with Zoom.
Research librarians can partner with you on systematic reviews.
Add us to your author team and we will design and manage complex, thorough searches in multiple databases. We will also provide you with:
advise on reference management (EndNote),
tables with detailed search strategies,
a narrative of the search methodology.