The UMCG participates in a national open access agreement with the publisher PLOS.
The agreement applies to seven journals. All publication types are covered under the agreement.
- PLOS ONE
- PLOS Complex Systems
- PLOS Computational Biology
- PLOS Digital Health
- PLOS Genetics
- PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
- PLOS Pathogens
Research funders NWO and ZonMW are also contributing financially to the agreement.
Financial implications for UMCG authors
Although both UG and UMCG participate in the deal, it has different financial implications for UG and UMCG authors:
- UMCG-affiliated authors receive a 50% discount
- UMCG-affiliated authors receive a 100% discount when project research funding by NWO or ZonMW is acknowledged in the article.
Please read the Medical Library Guide Act On Submission during submission for details and how to make use of the deal.
What are the conditions for using this agreement?
You can benefit from the agreement if you submit your article and list the UMCG as your primary affiliation.
NB: Acknowledging NWO and/or ZonMW project funding (when applicable) in the manuscript and during the submission process is essential to obtaining a 100% discount.
Please follow these guidelines during the submission process.
When is the agreement valid?
The contract takes effect as of 1 January 2025, and will be valid for two years. The date of editorial acceptance determines eligibility. In December 2025, the discount percentage for 2026 will be announced.
What should I do if I receive an invoice?
No APC payment is required at the time of publication. If your article is accepted in 2025, you should not receive an invoice for publishing in any of the eligible PLOS journals listed above. If you still receive an invoice from PLOS, please contact openaccess@umcg.nl and attach the invoice).
Who finances the publication costs and how are they handled?
- UMCG researchers will receive a 50% discount. The remainder of the APC has to be financed by the authors/departments, as usual. You will not receive an invoice from the publisher. Internal reimbursement goes via the Medical Library and your department/project controller.
- NWO and/or ZonMW participate in this deal and cover part of the costs. Thanks to their contributions, for articles acknowledging project funding from NWO and/or ZonMW, a 100% discount applies. Publication costs will not be internally charged to your department or project. Hence, authors cannot submit claims for reimbursement to ZonMW or NWO budgets.
- For all publications: researchers will receive a message from the Medical Library informing them whether or not their publication will be charged, depending on whether their project was funded by NWO/ZonMw.
For information and practical deatils: Medical ibrary guide Act On Submission
As of April 2025, the UG is a sponsoring member of Peer Community In (PCI). PCI is a scholar-led, non-profit organization offering peer review, recommendation and publication of scientific articles in open access for free. PCI is currently supported by 160+ universities and research institutions worldwide. This initiative offers a transparent, inclusive and affordable alternative publication model which is in line with the UG’s open science values and objectives.
How does it work?
Authors deposit their preprint, data, code in any open repository. They then submit the preprint to one of the thematic PCIs for open peer review. After evaluation by experts in the field, the article may be recommended (following a positive editorial decision made by a recommender based on at least two rigorous peer reviews and after one or several rounds of peer reviews). The recommendations are published in the thematic PCI websites and are fully citable. Authors can then decide to publish their article in Peer Community Journal (for free) or submit it to another journal.
What authors say about PCI
“I was a recommender for PCI, and it was basically like reviewing a paper. I am personally in favour of this approach since I think it is important that all science is openly available and not subject to large open access fees (this makes it unreachable for people from developing countries for example). Moreover, I think research should be judged on methodological accuracy, rather than how exciting the results are. I think PCI achieves these objectives. [...] What I think is interesting is that PCI is clearly focused on quality, since to become a recommender, you actually need to pass an exam. In other contexts, there are no such quality control measures.”
Dr. Marieke van Vugt, Associate Professor in Cognitive Modeling (Faculty of Science and Engineering).
“I see PCI and the PCI Journal as an amazing tool to challenge «mega journals». They provide a great outlet to publish solid research that cannot find a home in a more field-specific venue. It would probably save us (academia, funders, university) a ton of money in APCs if publishing there was more recognized.”
Dr. Sebastian Lequime, Assistant Professor in Virus Ecology & Evolution (Faculty of Science and Engineering).
Read more about PCI
Commenting on blog posts requires an account.
Login is required to interact with this comment. Please and try again.
If you do not have an account, Register Now.